Incontinence Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Incontinence, including details on urinary incontinence, bladder control, treatment, causes. | ||||||||
|
Pelvic-floor strength in women with incontinence as assessed by the brink scale.FitzGerald MP, Burgio KL, Borello-France DF, Menefee SA, Schaffer J, Kraus S, Mallett VT, Xu Y, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 S First Ave, Bldg 103, Room 1004, Maywood, IL 60153, USA. Mfitzg8@lumc.edu BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe how clinical pelvic-floor muscle (PFM) strength (force-generating capacity) is related to patient characteristics, lower urinary tract symptoms, and fecal incontinence symptoms. SUBJECTS: Data were obtained from 643 women who were participating in a randomized surgical trial for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. METHODS: Patient demographic variables, baseline urinary and fecal incontinence symptom questionnaires, urodynamic data and urinary diary data, pad test results, and standardized assessment of pelvic organ support were compared with PFM strength as described by the Brink scoring system. Bivariate analysis of factors associated with the Brink scale score was done using analysis of variance and linear regression. Multivariate analysis included patient variables that were significant on bivariate analysis. RESULTS: The mean Brink scale score was 9 (SD=2) and did not vary widely in this large, but highly select, patient sample. We found a weak, but statistically strong, relationship between age and Brink score. Brink scores were not related to diary and pad test measures of incontinence severity. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Overall, PFM strength was good in this sample of women with stress incontinence. Scores tended to be similar, and it is possible that the Brink scale does not reflect real clinical differences in PFM strength. Published 2 October 2007 in Phys Ther, 87(10): 1316-24.
© 2004-2008 Incontinence Research Today. All Rights Reserved. |
| ||||||
